|
|
October 1{{craft-stub}} and Cat:Craft stubs
The result of the debate was rename
Halfway through sorting decorative art stubs (I was tagging the textile arts with textile-stubs), I found this unlisted "crafts" template and category full of 60 textile arts, like knitting and weaving. It was not in the stub table of contents so its a discovery. Having a "craft" category could cause a conflict in scoping decorative art from crafts for others since they cover almost the same art medium when looking at the permanent categories. Anyway, there is nothing wrong with word crafts but it overlaps the category "decorative arts" almost entirely in scope, and that was not really what was inside. Here are 60 articles on textile arts (and there are more under textile-stubs). I have more tagged with textile-stub. I suggest to rename this what it is, textile arts, and change it's parent to "textile arts" rather than "arts and crafts". In our table of contents for stubs it could be added under decorative art as a subcategory of art. Goldenrowley 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
October 3Cat:Buildings and structures stubs and children
The result of the debate was rename
I hope I got all of them. Feel free to add any I missed.--CarabinieriTTaallkk 14:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
I was the one who proposed it and I decided to bring this issue here before creating them. I'll definately wait until this discussion is closed and hope noone else will create them because they're not aware of the discussion here.--CarabinieriTTaallkk 15:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
October 10{{lace-stub}} and Cat:lace stubs
The result of the debate was upmerge
{{Irish-struct-stub}} → {{Ireland-struct-stub}}
The result of the debate was rename per nom
October 11{{US-bassist-stub}} / Category:United States bassist stubs / {{US-bass-guitarist-stub}} ( Category:United States bass guitarist stubs
The result of the debate was delete bass guitarist cat, redirect template to bassist
various categories left over from upmerging
The result of the debate was delete
These are all from discoveries (see Archive 16 for more details). They were recommended to be upmerged, so I did, leaving these categories behind. Should be a quick delete all. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
various cvg sub-cats
The result of the debate was see last post by Amalas
Delete all ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Here's what I see:
If there are no major objections, I will close this later today. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 13:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
October 12Cat:Hyogo geography stubs / Cat:Kochi geography stubs /Cat:Hokkaido geography stubs
The result of the debate was redirect as per permcats
October 13Ancient Rome
The result of the debate was delete all Ancient-Rome-stub and its category are not severely oversized,fuck yet User:Neddyseagoon seems to have taken it upon himself to split it into a large number of completely unnecessary subcategories, all of which need severe work and preferably removal. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
As to being harsh, when you split off the new categories, you added in the instructions for what to do to propose new categories - instructions which you ignored in doing so. If you had been ignorant of the procedures, then it would have been more understandable -but the instructions were there and you tacitly acknowledged that by copying them across. Under those circumstances, this isn't harsh at all. Grutness...wha? 22:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I'll now explain what I was trying (albeit in a very imperfect manner) to do , under each sub-head. And whenever you say 'underpopulated', bear in mind that they were all at the embryonic stage and would have been much fuller had I got further through reclassifying the Ancient Rome stubs into them.User|Neddyseagoon 18:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
{{Ancient-Rome-geo-stub}}/Cat:Ancient Rome geographic stubs{{Ancient-Rome-town-stub}}/Cat:Ancient Rome town stubsOne of (two of) the more egregious attempts at stub types I've seen in my time working at WP:WSS. Where to start?
These need to be deleted, quickly and thoroughly. Grutness...wha? 23:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
{{Ancient-Rome-arch-stub}}/Cat:Ancient Roman building stubsWhile we're at it, there's this problem. There was an attempt to at least partially fix this unproposed stub type, which was reverted. It would have only been a temporary fix anyway. The template is an arch-stub, that is, an architectural feature or style stub, yet the category says that it is for buildings. In fact, it's for buildings and structures, and should be so named if kept, and the template should be Ancient-Rome-struct-stub. BUT again, buildings and structures are categorised by present day location, not by whichever civilisation built them, and as such this should be deleted. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using a combination of country-struct-stub and Ancient-Rome-stub for these items, in the same way as is done with other buildings and structures built by other civilisations. Grutness...wha? 23:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC) {{Ancient-Rome-reli-stub}}/Cat:Ancient Roman religion stubsNever proposed, severely undersized, and duplicates Cat:Ancient Roman mythology stubs. Delete. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC) {{Roman-Britain-stub}}/Cat:Roman Britain stubsFive stubs only, never proposed, and everything in it is better dealt with in other stub categories. Hideously big icon, too. Delete. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC) {{Rome-ethno-group-stub}}/Cat:Roman ethnic group stubsSeverely undersized, never proposed, and fallaciously named. None of these are Roman ethnic groups. They are ethnic groups that lived at the time of the Ancient Roman civilisation and were described by them. Only the Latini and the Romans themselves could really be considered "Roman ethnic groups". Delete. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
{{Ancient-Rome-law-stub}}/Cat:Ancient Rome law stubsSeverely undersized, never proposed, you know the routine by now. Delete. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC) {{Ancient-Rome-lit-stub}}/Cat:Latin literature stubsAgain, never proposed, severely undersized. Seems to erroneously suggest that all literature in Latin is from Ancient Rome (tell that to the Catholics). Delete Grutness...wha? 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
{{AncientRome-war-stub}}/Cat:Ancient Roman war stubsMissed one - as above, undersized (six stubs), unproposed... everything here could go into the hardly-bulging ancient Rome battle or military stub categories - this one is completely unnecessary. Delete. Grutness...wha? 01:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
October 14{{Etruscan-stub}}/Cat:Etruscan stubs
The result of the debate was delete
October 16{{Richmond-ca-stub}}
The result of the debate was delete
{{Palestine-stub}}s
The result of the debate was No consensus. Unclear nomination, neither proposal or status quo in line with stub-sorting practice, suggestions of vote-stacking on both sides. Please agree a scope for this type, and then revisit the naming issue
Hossein.ir 12:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
|